You are exploring a new New Economy Analyst Report at www.juergendaum.com

 

The new New Economy Analyst Report – Febr. 6, 2005

Juergen Daum’s new New Economy Best Practice service

©2005 Juergen Daum. All rights reserved.

 

Back

Deutsche Version

 

Intangible Assets and Value-Based Network Control in the Automotive Industry. Part 1: The role of a intangibles-based analysis of the value creation system – the example of Toyota

News categories: The New Economy Economics, strategy / strategy management, Performance management and controlling, Investor and Stakeholder Relations

 

by Juergen H. Daum

 

This article is an outcome of the work of the author for the German roundtable “Network-Based Management/Network Value Added in the Automobile Industry” founded by the European Business School, Oestrich-Winkel/Germany, and several German car manufactures and automotive suppliers. This article has been published in German in: Gleich, Ronald (editor): Network Value Added – Planung und Steuerung von Netzwerken in der Automobilindustrie, Forschungsbericht aus der Reihe General Management der Supply Management Group, St. Gallen/Switzerland, 2004,
p. 123-182

 

 

Introduction to the topic of the article: The need for an intangible-assets perspective

 

Significant differences between companies exist with respect to both their internal business logic and their resource or asset structure. From the financial perspective of cash flows and balance sheets, two companies could look exactly alike: the same revenues, margins, and balance sheet structure. The differences only become apparent from the perspective of intangible assets, which reveal how a company actually creates value. With an intangible assets perspective you can identify the key competencies, resources, and assets, and show how they are converted through processes and structural capital to generate customer value and the revenues and cash flows that result from it. It also helps to indicate how fit the company is for the future and which risks it carries. Only with the intangible assets perspective is it possible to judge how efficiently a company creates value added, and the probability that it can maintain this capability in the future.

 

The intangible assets perspective is therefore the foundation of a new, enhanced enterprise model that goes beyond the traditional accounting-based approach. While a financial or accounting perspective measures the actual situation of a company from a financial point of view (financial inputs in the form of investments and expenses versus financial outputs in the form of profit or free cash flows), the intangible assets perspective adds to this the understanding of the complex interrelationship between resources and conversion processes so that management can better understand their true value drivers and value creation processes in order to in order to manage and control future financial performance. Only with such an approach can the true drivers and processes of value creation be optimized and the enterprise total factor productivity continuously improved.

 

This is discussed in this article taking the example of Toyota.

 

In the face of the success of Toyota, the American journalist and expert on the automotive industry, Micheline Maynard, predicts in her book The End of Detroit that the dominance of American companies in the automotive industry is coming to an end and that at least one of the Big Three will have disappeared from the scene by the end of the decade. 

 

What is the reason for Toyota’s success and for the failure of the American Big Three?

 

In Micheline Maynard’s view, the Big Three’s troubles have come about mainly because they no longer understand customer needs (as Toyota does) and because they focus too much on short-term financial results. It is indeed possible to see this development as one of losing the understanding, sensitivity, or “nose” for intangible customer values and how they arise in the value creation system, and instead managing from purely a financial perspective even though financial results are simply a delayed reflection of how customers value the product. US manufacturers are no longer able to maintain a balance between customer value and financial returns, which endangers their competitiveness and long-term survival. What they neglect is the intangible assets perspective and an intangible assets-based strategy.

 

This article takes Toyota as an example to discuss the implications and insights an intangible assets perspective based analysis can provide to management and investors alike in order to either judge or manage sustaining competitive advantage and shareholder value.

 

Abstract of the article

 

In addition to continue to come up with technical innovations such as the development of environmentally friendly cars, one of the biggest challenges for the automotive industry in the coming years and decades will be to create value by significantly enhancing the individual experience that customers have with its products, i.e. to move to a comprehhensive customer value-based aproach. For car manufacturers (OEMs), two factors will play a crucial role in this endeavor. First, their ability to create value while continually increasing productivity in the entire enterprise network (together with suppliers, development partners, distribution partners, service partners, and so on). And this means that they have to find new ways of collaboration in order to  better control the complex value creation system engendered by a comprehensive customer value-based approach. Second, their ability to increase their value potentials and those of their partners, which simply means being able to manage the company or network in such a way that makes best use of their intangible assets and those of partners. This is the only way to sustainably create customer value and generate adequate financial returns. Intangible assets, however, can only develop their power to create value for customers, shareholders, and other stakeholders within a specific enterprise value creation system and therefore should not be considered in isolation within enterprise management. The present article will illustrate these points, provide an introduction to Intangible Assets Management, and establish an initial point of departure for enterprise management in the automotive industry taking intangible assets into account (from the perspective of an OEM), based on the example of the value creation system of Toyota Motor Corporation. The second part of this article, which is planned for the next research report of roundtable "Network-Based Control/Network Value Added in the Automotive Industry" will then investigate how the insights gained in this article can be developed into a comprehensive model of network management based on intangible assets.

 

 

Read the full article

 

Intangible Assets and Value-Based Network Control in the Automotive Industry. Part 1: The role of a intangibles-based analysis of the value creation system – the example of Toyota

(requires Acrobat Reader) 

 

 

 

About the Author

Juergen H. Daum is Management Advisor, Finance & Enterprise Control Expert, and Chief Solution Architect of  the Business Solution Architects Group EMEA of  SAP (based at the SAP headquarters in Walldorf/Germany). For the CFOs, controllers and other finance professionals of  many European companies he acts as an idea generator and catalyst for redesigning the finance organization and the enterprise control system. He regularly publishes articles in journals, speaks at conferences on enterprise management and finance topics, and runs workshops with finance profesionals. He is the author of Intangible Assets and Value Creation (Wiley, 2003). Before joining SAP in 1992 he was the CFO of a midsized German company. Website: http://www.juergendaum.com

 

 

Additional Resources:

 

Interview with Baruch Lev: Accounting, Reporting and Intangible Assets

 

Why a new Management System ? – article by Juergen H. Daum

 

Juergen H. Daum's groundbraking book: Intangible Assets and Value Creation, Wiley 2003

 

J.D.’s Best Practice Channel – Finance

 

 

Related articles from earlier new New Economy Analyst Reports:

 

The dominance of intangible assets: consequences for enterprise management and corporate reporting

 

Vector-Based Performance Measurement: Linking the Subjective and Objective Dimension into One System of Performance Measurement

 

Report from the First PMA Intellectual Capital Research Symposium held in Cranfield, UK, 1-2 October 2003

 

A European Peer Discussion: “Measuring and Managing Intangible Values in Today’s Economy”

 

Intangible Assets: a central topic at the mySAP Financials conference in Strasbourg

 

Corporate Performance Management: Managing profitability and growth in the new environment

 

How to create value with Real Options based innovation management

 

Interview with Leif Edvinsson: Intellectual Capital: the new wealth of corporations

 

The new FASB rules for reporting on Intangible Asset - The U.S. versus the European way

 

The book of the month: “Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting” by Baruch Lev

 

How Systems Thinking / Systems Dynamics helps to identify limits to growth to boost innovation value

 

How accounting gets more radical in measuring what really matters to investors

 

Interview with David P. Norton: "Intangible Assets and the Balanced Scorecard"

 

 

 

 

More about New New Economy Economics and Management Best Practice in general, and about other related topics will be continued here in this new New Economy Analyst reports.. To subscribe for Juergen Daum’s free-of-charge e-mail push newsletter click here. 

 

… feedback

 

Back

 

 

You are exploring a new New Economy Analyst Report at www.juergendaum.com

©2005 Juergen Daum. All rights reserved.
Copyright, Trademarks and Disclaimer