-HOME-

 

 

Juergen Daum’s Book Store on New Economy Management Best Practice Literature:

 


Find out more about Juergen Daum's  new book on new management concepts for the Intangible Assets and knowledge based economy of today.
 


 

Archive of past "Books of The Month": 

The Book of The Month June/July 2002: 

Corporate Longitude: Discover Your True Position in the Knowledge Economy

by Leif Edvinsson

The Book of The Month March 2002

The Digital Storm - Fresh Business Strategies from the Electronic Marketplace
 

by Philipp Gerbert and Alex Birch with Gerd Schnetkamp and Dirk Schneider

The Book of The Month January/February 2002:


Good to Great: Why some companies make the leap…and others don’t
 

by Jim Collins

The Book of The Month November/December 2001:


Ownership and Value Creation : Strategic Corporate Governance in the New Economy 
by Rolf H. Carlsson

The Book of The Month, October 2001:

Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting
 

by Baruch Lev
The Book of The Month, September 2001:

Managing The Professional Service Firm
 

by David H. Maister
The Book of The Month, Mai/June 2001:
The Value Reporting Revolution: Moving Beyond the Earnings Game

by Robert G. Eccles, Robert H. Herz, E. Mary Keegan, David M. H. Phillips
The Book of The Month, April 2001:

The Mind of the C.E.O.

by Jeffrey E. Garten
The Book of The Month, March 2001:

The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail
 

by Clayton M. Christensen
The Book of The Month, February 2001:

The Long Boom: A vision for the coming age of prosperity


by Peter Schwartz, Peter Leyden and Joel Hyatt
The Book of The Month, January 2001:

The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization


by Thomas L. Friedman
The Book of The Month, December 2000:

The Strategy-Focused Organization

by Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton
The Book of The Month, November 2000:  

Meta-Capitalism


by Grady Means and David Schneider
The Book of The Month, October 2000:

Future Wealth


by Stan Davis and Christopher Meyer
The Book of The Month, September 2000:  

Living and Working in an Interconnected World


by Daniel Amor
The Book of The Month, August 2000:

Funky Business: Talent Makes Capital Dance


by Jonas Ridderstrale, Kjell Nordstrom

  

Back to actual book of the month

 

Back to book store

 

 

 

The Book of The Month June/July 2002:

 

 

Companies need new navigation tools
to excel and thrive in today’s knowledge economy
by leveraging their full Intellectual Capital

 

“Corporate Longitude describes my approach to the corporate longitude problem. It does not provide a definitive compass for our organizational and personal behaviour. Nothing could – no matter what the self-improvement gurus may tell you. Instead, I hope, Corporate Longitude offers different ways of looking at problems. I believe that it is only through new perspectives that we can gain new insights. And it is only through new questions and perspectives that we will be able to chart the uncertain waters of our futures. The future, after all, is made up of what we do not know. Join me in a knowledge navigation journey, exploring the futures of the mind and of knowledge enterprising."


                                                                  Leif Edvinsson

Leif Edvinsson is using an analogy of the naval world to bring over his message in his new book: longitude, which stands for long-term, long lasting – precisely what is missing in today’s turbo management approach focused on short term earnings. Instead, his compass leads us to an orientation of new coordinates for sustainable results by using both the full potential of human individuals and of organizations that provide context, structure and relationships to talented people to create sustainable value for customers, shareholders, other stakeholders, and societies.

“Corporate Longitude” describes a journey, basically the journey of the author through ten years of work on “Intellectual Capital Management” since he joined the financial service company Skandia as the world’s first corporate director for intellectual capital in 1991. At Skandia he pioneered the development of a management and reporting model – entitled the Navigator – based around intellectual capital. His 1997 book, “Intellectual Capital”, co-authored with Michael Malone, drew on his experiences at Skandia. Edvinsson has left the company in Fall 1999 and became  the World’s first associate professor in Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Economics at Lund University in Sweden and serves as board member for various companies and is much in demand as speaker. This gave him the opportunity to have a much broader view on Intellectual Capital management, which is precisely what he is sharing with his readers in his new book “Corporate Longitude”.

The journey, Leif Edvinsson’s story, starts in the 17th century when King Charles II of England founded the Royal Observatory within the park at Greenwich. The Observatory was tasked with finding a method of accurately determining longitude at sea so that sailors could navigate the world’s oceans. About 60 years later a little-educated clockmaker from Lincolnshire, John Harrison, arrived in London to work on this task and to win the prize which was set out for finding a solution “tried and found Practicable and Useful at Sea”. Harrison was an inspired thinker and innovator and he approached the problem from new perspectives. But he was an outsider. It was thought that the answer to the problem would emerge for the scientific elite or the professionals in the Navy. Harrison’s work was ignored and overlooked and it took him thirty years to enhance the design of his solution and to convince the officials that he possessed the answer and deserved the price.

According to Edvinsson, similar challenges currently face the business world. Modern corporations are used to act only in one dimension and calibrate along one, single measure: financial capital. This does not allow a company to sail the knowledge based economy of today with sustaining success. The financial view gives corporations only part of the picture, only half of the co-ordinates required to know their precise location and to map out the route to their renewal. Without another lateral co-ordinate – a measurement for intellectual capital and other vital intangibles – companies are unable to locate their true potential or chart a meaningful course into the future.

To most twenty-first century men and women, the mind is as mysterious as longitude was to eighteenth century sailors, as Edvinsson writes. And we are disbelieving of the brain’s potential. We need fresh, longitudinal, perspectives to make sense of our most cherished possessions. But also to organizations the implications are significant. Unfortunately, most organizations are even less prepared for the challenge of “knowledge economics” than individuals are. But when managerial methods and notions of how best to organize ourselves stand still, when the world moves on into the knowledge economy of the 21st century, this results in organizational failures.

Without means of measuring longitude, all see navigation was regional. Sailors needed a clockmaker to crack the longitude problem so they could chart their whereabouts accurately and easily. And this is the context in which modern corporations and institutions operate. For all the talk of the global economy, companies and those who work within them remain trapped in their own intellectual and geographical locale. They are fearful of leaving the protection of the coastal shelf they know. To move further out, to venture from safety into new realms filled with personal and commercial potential, they need a practical method for measuring corporate longitude – something which is urgently needed. This is the mission of Leif Edvinsson’s new book and the objective of the journey to which he takes the reader. Here the “chapters” of the journey:

1.      My Journey – Every journey begins, but not all reach their aspired end (this one starts at Villa Askudden near Stockholm, the Skandia Future Center)

2.      The New Knowledge Economics – The economics of goods and markets have given way to the economics of knowledge and the migration of knowledge (about thought leaders, knowledge recipes, and the “intangible hand”)

3.      Changing the Nature of Value – One man’s treasure is another man’s worthless mystery (what is valuable?, talent markets, trust, relationship capital)

4.      Renaissance Perspectives – Enterprise & people are built in the future not in the past (accounting and the intangible gap, new perspectives to navigate the future)

5.      1+1=11 – the new theory of the firm (the chaordic organization – the future of business organizations, human capital X structural capital = intellectual capital, creating intelligent and holistic enterprising)

6.      Workplace fit for knowledge workers – You are where you work (knowledge work spaces with sense and meaning)

7.      U-Capital & I-Commerce – We are what we visualize (one man’s south is another man’s north, brain stress, building identity assets)

8.      The Knowledge Innovation Dimension – The only vital value an enterprise has is the experience, skills, innovativeness and insights of its people (innovation perspectives, white space management / managing the space between organizational boxes, innovating culture)

9.      Leading with a compass – The leader always required a compass. Now the leader must posses a mental compass (leading the new generation / the new challenges, refining the behaviour and attitude of leaders, the leader’s job today / shaping leadership perspectives)

10.   The Intellectual Wealth of Nations – The stories of our societies and of our nations are mirrors of our selves and our organizations (the new wealth of nations, taking stock of the world).

Leif Edvinsson writes on his arrival: “My learning from this journey are many. What I know is that the wave is increasing. It has gathered within universities, accounting standards groups, political and business communities. The message is that we need to surf the wave of knowledge economics or drown. The opportunity is great. There are a great many people who are lost at sea, lost  in the fog of the labour market, the stock market or confused by the political world. They need to understand corporate longitude otherwise they will continue to go around in befuddled circles. Knowledge navigation will continue on the quest for the new wealth of nations. There is no end, just another question, another curious leap into the dark. In the knowledge economy, the beginning is an end in itself”.

“Corporate Longitude” is not just a book about Intellectual Capital or Knowledge Management. It’s a culmination point of all the related ideas, thoughts and concepts. Leif Edvinsson did a tremendous job in documenting not only the though path of his own work of the last decade, he also made the underlying network of people and ideas transparent through the “compass links” at the end of each chapter and on the official website of his new book.  This book is a must read for everyone interested in management science and economics or just in his or her personal career.

About the author:

Leif Edvinsson, who calls himself a global knowledge nomad, championed early moves to nourish intellectual capital (IC) and to have it measured in corporate annual reports. His 1997 book “Intellectual Capital” (co-authored with Michael Malone) drew on Edvinsson’s experiences at the financial service company Skandia where he was appointed the world’s first corporate director of intellectual capital in 1991. He is also co-author of “Accounting for Minds” (with Gottfried Grafström, 1998). At Skandia, Edvinsson pioneered the development of a management and reporting model – entitled the Navigator – based around intellectual capital. He also developed the “Skandia Future Center”, an organizational laboratory, as a knowledge innovation tool. Having left Skandia in Fall 1999, he was recently appointed the World’s first associate professor in Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Economics at Lund University in Sweden, and he is much in demand as a board member and speaker. He is now developing a holding company for intellectual capital recipes Universal Networking Intellectual Capital (UNIC – www.unic.net)

Interview with Leif Edvinsson: Intellectual Capital: the new wealth of corporations by Juergen Daum

 

 

Corporate Longitude: Discover Your True Position in the Knowledge Economy
by Leif Edvinsson
Hardcover - 256 pages (July 2002)
Financial Times Prentice Hall; ISBN: 0273656279 
 


 

… feedback

  Back to top         

 

The Book of The Month March 2002:

 

 

In order to achieve the all-important differentiation, companies have to think about how to use the electronic marketplace in a novel way to deliver unique and superior value

 

“The first advantage the Internet delivers is transparency. All things being equal, it transforms the world into a buyer’s market. As a consequence, prices have a tendency to drop faster than process changes can get implemented [through e-business solutions that increase efficiency and reduce costs]. Transparency combined with lack of differentiation squeezes margins. In order to achieve the all-important differentiation, companies have to do things better than the rest of the industry. They have to think about how to use the electronic marketplace in a novel way to deliver unique and superior value. When differentiation is the goal […] then fully public markets are no longer appropriate. Instead, companies have to establish their own trading partner network."


              Philip Gerbert, Alex Birch, Gert Schnetkamp and Dirk Schneider

 

The first E-Business wave with utopian visions of electronic marketplaces that dominate entire industries, organizing trading, the matching of buyers and sellers, in new ways and dictating their business models to all industry players has passed by. In the meanwhile a great number of e-marketplaces has imploded, unable to attract the necessary business volume. They ignored the basic lesson that the very architecture of the Internet had taught: Interlinked dynamic networks, as opposed to large centralized structures, are the superior organizational forms. Today’s complex business relationships cannot thrive in a rigid corset of simplistic processes, as provided by many e-markets, any more than they could under central planning regimes. Instead, they need a flexible service network to support diversity and innovation. “E-topia is now gone. It is an irony of fate that the Internet hype has faded at the very moment the importance of electronic business was becoming evident” says Holmes in the fictitious dialog with Watson in the prologue to the book. The mission of “Digital Storm” is to describe how electronic business will really change the world and what companies have to do to leverage its power. 

The authors give an excellent account of the rise of the e-marketplaces and the digital storm they encountered by their pioneering acts. They do not just show what went wrong; they also show that the potential of the e-market places will continue to be in a networked environment, albeit a different one. With “Digital Storm” the authors want to dig much deeper than many others did during the first e-business / e-market wave and their aim is to show, that the burst of the Internet bubble does not mean that e-business has lost its power. On the contrary. After the corrections made in their e-business strategies based on the past experiences, companies and the economy at large will rely heavily on electronic business and on new forms of electronic marketplaces. The core of their message is, that differentiation, not imitation (which happened widely during the first e-business wave), creates value. Profitability will come from innovative value propositions. Thus future e-markets will differ in many ways from today’s landscape. Companies will use the support of multiple e-markets to enable their trading networks. They will, however, refrain from a “portfolio approach” to markets. Instead they will avoid overlap, but use complementary e-markets. These markets, like other companies, have to differentiate. The authors believe, that this means for individual companies and their e-business / e-market initiatives that

§        Successful players will strive to consolidate the segment

§        Markets become networked

§        Every company will have a private marketplace

§        E-markets will increasingly focus on services

§        Dynamic trading partner networks will evolve  

Anybody who has ever led an e-business initiative can confirm that it all starts and ends with the software. Therefore software is playing a key role in the e-business and e-market vision of the authors. Software determines the ability of companies to leverage the Internet. Sadly, software is also the weakest element of the infrastructure. The authors talk about the “software gap”. The complexity of software, slow progress in development and compatibility requirements with legacy systems are the main reasons for this software gap. Reinventing software as a service could lead the way out of this “software gap”. An architectural solution, Web services, has been proposed and is being pursued by many vendors. It consists of self-describing “Lego”-Software, interacting through the Internet. Pioneered by Hewlett-Packard, Web services have recently been most prominently adopted by Microsoft in its .Net initiative. If successful, they could bridge the software gap.

The most essential task for companies in pursuing an e-business / e-market based business strategy is to develop a strategic perspective first. Incremental improvements of existing business models and processes are inappropriate in the electronic marketplace at this point in time. Too many things are in flux. Ambitious initiatives are under way, claiming – rightly or wrongly – to restructure whole industries. It is thus essential for companies, the authors write, to step back and reconsider the own industry from the bottom up. When they have understood the potential for truly innovative value creation, they will be able to judge the current initiatives in the electronic marketplace and devise their own e-business strategy. Therefore Gerbert, Birch, Schnetkamp and Schneider recommend a multi-step approach in developing the e-business strategy of the company:

§        Understand today’s value delivery network and trends (of the own industry):
An environmental map of the flow of goods and services in the industry is a mandatory first step.

§        Identify core processes and pain points:
The next step is to distil the most relevant core processes in the value delivery and identify the major pain points in the processes today. By analysing these pain points based on the know how of the company, what an electronic marketplace can achieve, it is possible to grasp the efficiency potential an restructuring opportunity today’s value delivery.

§        Map out current e-market initiatives:
Classify, map and analyse existing e-market initiatives. While many may fail, the few remaining could have a deep impact on the own sector.

§        Devise (extreme) end game scenarios and triggers:
By devising (extreme) end game scenarios, their implications, in particular the attractive and unattractive roles, become very clear.

§        Design end-customer driven value innovations:
The critical creative step consists of rethinking how the electronic marketplace can be leveraged for novel value propositions. Such an analysis always starts with the end-customer and works backwards through the demand network.

In the end, what matters for a company is its ability to identify and execute its own winning e-play. Its business may be at stake. Also the financial commitments for a strong e-business/e-market initiative are substantial. Thus the strategy should be well elaborated. At the same time, project efficiency is critical in the fast moving electronic marketplace. Therefore the authors describe in the last chapter a tested streamlined process companies can follow to build a promising e-business.

“Digital Storm” is not about the Internet. It is about doing business in the new century. In 1999 Lou Gerstner, Chief Executive of IBM, commented: "The dot.coms are only the fireflies before the storm." While much has been written about the fireflies, the current book focuses on the storm. More specifically, it provides insights to help companies sail through the digital storm, while exposing shortcomings in past and present concepts. The authors use strong examples in explaining why online e-marketplaces have evolved the way they have, and they do a great job of laying the groundwork to help leaders navigate through the future innovations we're likely to see. Digital Storm provides a comprehensive picture of the electronic business-to-business landscape and its likely evolution. The book delivers a sharp analysis that cuts through the rather short-lived business coverage available so far. This is a definite must-read for everyone who needs to understand the pitfalls in building e-marketplaces and how to exploit their potential.

About the authors:

Philipp Gerbert is a partner of the McKenna Group and is based at its headquarters in Silicon Valley. He has extensive experience in electronic business / electronic commerce, Internet infrastructure and innovation management. He serves large multinationals as well as emerging new players. He is on the board of several Silicon Valley ventures and is a regular contributor to major business publications. The McKenna Group (www.mckenna-group.com) from Silicon Valley is the leading strategic consulting firm for technology-enabled growth.

Alex Birch is a director in the London office of OC&C Strategy Consultants (www.occstrategy.co.uk). His particular interest lies in how to exploit new technologies to achieve growth. He advices companies – both large and small – in the telecommunications, media, entertainment and leisure industries. He is on the board of a number of early-stage businesses.

Gert Schnetkamp heads the German office of OC&C Strategy Consultants (www.occstrategy.de). He is an internationally acclaimed authority in the retail and services sectors and has been heavily involved in the development of strategies for leading companies entering the New Economy in a broad range of sectors. Together with Dirk Schneider, he wrote a German language precursor of the current book called “E-Markets”.

 

The Digital Storm - Fresh Business Strategies from the Electronic Marketplace 
by Philipp Gerbert and Alex Birch with Gerd Schnetkamp and Dirk Schneider

Hardcover - 352 pages (July 2001)
Capstone Publishing Limited; ISBN: 1841121681
 


 

… feedback

  Back to top          

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Book of The Month January/February 2002:

 

Not high-profile leaders with big personalities, but CEOs with a paradoxical blend of personal humility and professional will are required to lead companies from good to great 

“We were surprised, shocked really, to discover the type of leadership required for turning a good company into a great one. Compared to high-profile leaders with big personalities who make headlines and become celebrities, the good-to-great leaders seem to have come from Mars. Self-effacing, quiet, reserved even shy – these leaders are a paradoxical blend of personal humility and professional will. They are more like Lincoln and Socrates than Patton or Caesar. […] Some of the key concepts discerned in the study fly in the face of our modern business culture and will, quite frankly, upset some people."


              Jim Collins

 

A Decade ago Jim Collins made a name for himself with the book “Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies. That best-seller, written with Jerry Porras, looked deeply at companies that were outstanding at their founding and managed to sustain their greatness. But the companies he wrote about in that book were, for the most part, always great. They never had to turn themselves from good companies into great companies. They had parents like David Packard and George Merck, who shaped the character of greatness from early on. But what about the vast majority of companies that wake up partway through life and realize that they are good, but not great ? What about companies that are merely good, or even mediocre, and then achieve greatness ? That is the subject of Collins’ “Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap…and Others Don’t”, the culmination of five years of work by Collins and a team of 20 researchers.

What this book makes unique and a must read for everybody interested in management is that it breaks with the common opinions about what the best leaders are or have to be. Collins and his team are proving that the best leaders are not the famous charismatic “super CEO” type of managers. Instead, they are making the case, that level 5 leaders, that is how they are calling them, are the ones who are able to lead their companies from good to great. Level 5 leaders are ambitious for the success of the company rather than for themselves. They also want to set up the company for success in the next generation, so it can be come even greater. In contrast, the level 4 leader is not interested in having the company continue on a great level after he’s gone. After all, it’s a testament to his greatness that his company can’t sustain its greatness without him.

Collins insists, that he was not looking specifically for Level 5 leader in his study. In fact he told his researchers to downplay the role of the top executive in order to avoid the “leadership is everything” line of thinking so common today. They identified out of 1,435 companies that appeared on the Fortune 500 companies that followed a pattern: 15 years of cumulative stock returns at or below the general stock market, then a transition point leading to cumulative returns of at least three times the market over the next 15 years. These are, according to Collins criteria, the companies that went from good or average to great. The researchers found 11 companies that met this criteria. They were hardly glamorous corporations: Kimberley-Clark, Abbott, Fannie Mae, Gillette, Pitney Bowes, Circuit city, Kroger, Nucor, Philip Morris, Walgreens and Wells Fargo. The team then compared these good-to-great companies with a group of “direct comparison companies” – those that were in the same industry as the good-to-great companies with the same opportunities and similar resources at the time of transition, but couldn’t make the leap, and another group of companies – named “unsustained comparisons”, which made a short term shift from good to great but failed to maintain the trajectory. Then they tried to identify what was inside the Black Box which represented the specific capability of the good-to-great companies compared with the others. They compared the 28 companies under investigation and were looking for everything from acquisitions to executive compensation, from business strategy to corporate culture, from layoffs to leadership style, from financial ratios to management turnover. Collins and his team were just as astonished at what they did not find as what they did. Here some examples:

-        Lager-than-life, celebrity leaders who ride in from the outside are negatively correlated with taking a company from good to great. Ten of eleven  good-to-great CEOs came from inside the company, whereas the comparison companies tried outside CEOs six times more often.

-        They found not systematic pattern linking specific forms of executive compensation to the process of going from good to great. The idea that the structure of executive compensation is a key driver in corporate performance is simply not supported by the data.

-        The good-to-great companies did not focus principally on what to do to become great; they focused equally on what not to do what to stop doing

-        Technology and technology-driven change has virtually nothing to do with igniting a transformation from good to great. Technology can accelerate a transformation, but technology cannot cause a transformation

-        The good-to-great companies paid scant attention to managing change, motivating people, or creating alignment. Under the right conditions, the problems of commitment, alignment, motivation, and change largely melt away.

-        The good-to-great companies had not name, tag line, launch event, or program to signify their transformations. Indeed, some reported being unaware of the magnitude of the transformation at the time; only later, in retrospect, did it become clear. They produced a truly revolutionary leap in results, but not by a revolutionary process.

-        The good-to-great companies were not, by and large, in great industries, and some were in terrible industries. So Collins concludes: greatness is not a function of circumstance. Greatness is largely a matter of conscious choice.

Colin’s and his researcher’s findings, in particular about leadership, may well influence the way companies go about choosing CEOs. Instead of seeking the brightest star in the firmament, boards may more readily look inside their own companies.

According to Collin’s, the boards in the good-to-great companies understood that they were trying to built share value; the boards in the comparison companies were trying to increase share price. The difference in Collin’s words is, that a CEO can affect share price in a two-year period in any number of ways without increasing underlying share value. Thinking about the price of a share in anything less than a five-year horizon, means to confuse the concepts of price and value. And that requires from the board to stay back and select a CEO that is focused on the fundamentals of the company not on hype and their own celebrity.

Collins cites several examples in his books that emphasize the difference between level 5 and level 4 leaders. As an example for a level 4 leader he names Stanley Gault at Rubbermaid. A man who knew what to do, when he joined, and who got good results, even great results, but when he walks away, the place implodes – he just left helpers, no one that could replace him. He lacked to transfer his capabilities into the organization – which is what level 5 leaders do, who prepare their companies for the days after them. Level 5 leaders are very comfortable being surrounded by outstanding people. They also try to create the excellence within the organization, within its structural capital instead to tie it to a person, to themselve, like level 4 leaders do.

Here the key findings of the study:

Collins concludes that average companies can indeed morph into great ones. Provided that the select disciplined people and apply disciplined thought and disciplined action. Among the conclusions about Good to Great companies:

1. Their leaders are less differentiated by charisma or brilliant vision and more by humility, unrelenting will and by focus on the fundamentals of the company

2. Their focus is first on WHO (i.e., getting the right people through the door and in the right position, and the wrong people out door), then WHAT (i.e., figuring out and building the strategy)-- not the other way around.

3. They confront the brutal facts and deal with them directly and decisively by "shining a light" on the key issues impacting the business and taking a "need to know" perspective at all times to reality as it really exists. At the same time, this pragmatism is counterbalanced by an unrelenting guttural belief that they will prevail in the end (called the Stockdale Paradox).

4. They build their strategy around three core circles (target markets they realistically believe they can dominate, ones with compelling economics, and ones they can be truly passionate about), and then come up with a crystallizing concept (called the Hedgehog) that flows from a deep understanding of the dynamics of the three circles.

5. The hedgehog concept's power is less a function of one big transformation and more a product of many incremental improvements, culminating in the breakout success (debunking the myth of the overnight success). Ironically, to those inside the company the magnitude of the transformation is often unclear at the time.

6. They depend on building a culture of self-disciplined team members around the three circles (disciplined people, practicing disciplined thought and translating that into disciplined action) to the point of avoiding any "once in a lifetime opportunities" that fall outside the hedgehog concept. Also, as a result, they are able to avoid bureaucratic corporate structures.

7. They embrace new technologies solely as accelerators of the three circles and not creators of them, and avoid investments that don't specifically feed the three circles.

8. There are no inconsistencies with reconciling short-term financial performance pressures and maintaining long-term adherence to working the flywheel of the hedgehog concept to create a virtuous cycle of growth and sustenance. In short, these companies embrace the paradox that managing for both short-term and long-term success simultaneously is challenging but part of the "problem" being solved by the business.

As I wrote earlier, we are today somehow at an inclination point in enterprise management which requires companies to conceive, implement and use new techniques in general management that will keep them in business in the future and enable them to manage for sustainable profitability and growth in an environment, that is totally different from the one, where most of our management techniques of today originated: from the industrial manufacturing enterprise. But succeed in the transformation is not only about management techniques and management systems. It’s at least equally important which people are running the companies, it’s also important to select the right top managers and CEO’s. Collin’s new book provides very valuable and surprising insights for the criteria boards have to imply in this selection process.

“GOOD TO GREAT” is one of those rare books that presents important research findings, and then explains in a clear, concise and compelling manner how to take that learning and directly apply it to effect a good-to-great transformation in any company.  

About the author:

Jim Collins is coauthor of “Built to Last”, a bestseller for over five years with a million copies in print. A student of enduring great companies, he serves as a teacher to leaders throughout the corporate and social sectors. Formerly a faculty member at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business, where he received the Distinguished Teaching Award, he now works from his management research laboratory in Boulder, Colaroda, USA. He can be reached at www.jimcollins.com

Good to Great: Why some companies make the leap…and others don’t 
by Jim Collins

Hardcover - 320 pages (October 2001)
HarperCollins; ISBN: 0066620996
 



… feedback

Back to top

 

 

 

The Book of The Month November/December 2001:

 

 

A new way to approach Corporate Governance: Shareholders have to become Shareowners