
Juergen Daum’s Book Store on New Economy Management Best Practice Literature:
Archive of past "Books of The Month":
|
The Book of The Month
June/July 2002: |
|
The Book of The Month March 2002: |
|
The Book of The Month January/February 2002:
|
|
The Book of The Month November/December 2001:
|
| The Book of The Month, October 2001: Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting by Baruch Lev |
| The Book of The Month, September 2001: Managing The Professional Service Firm by David H. Maister |
| The Book of The Month, Mai/June 2001: The Value Reporting Revolution: Moving Beyond the Earnings Game by Robert G. Eccles, Robert H. Herz, E. Mary Keegan, David M. H. Phillips |
| The Book of The Month, April 2001: The Mind of the C.E.O. by Jeffrey E. Garten |
| The Book of The Month, March 2001: The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail by Clayton M. Christensen |
| The Book of The Month, February 2001: The Long Boom: A vision for the coming age of prosperity by Peter Schwartz, Peter Leyden and Joel Hyatt |
| The Book of The Month, January 2001: The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization by Thomas L. Friedman |
| The Book of The Month, December 2000: The Strategy-Focused Organization by Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton |
| The Book of The Month, November 2000: Meta-Capitalism by Grady Means and David Schneider |
| The Book of The Month, October 2000: Future Wealth by Stan Davis and Christopher Meyer |
| The Book of The Month, September 2000: Living and Working in an Interconnected World by Daniel Amor |
| The Book of The Month, August 2000: Funky Business: Talent Makes Capital Dance by Jonas Ridderstrale, Kjell Nordstrom |
Back to actual book of the month
The Book of The Month June/July 2002:
|
Companies
need new navigation
tools
Leif
Edvinsson is using an
analogy of the naval
world to bring over
his message in his new
book: longitude,
which stands for
long-term, long
lasting – precisely
what is missing in
today’s turbo
management approach
focused on short term
earnings. Instead, his
compass leads us to an
orientation of new
coordinates for
sustainable results by
using both the full
potential of human
individuals and of
organizations that
provide context,
structure and
relationships to
talented people to
create sustainable
value for customers,
shareholders, other
stakeholders, and
societies. “Corporate
Longitude” describes
a journey, basically
the journey of the
author through ten
years of work on
“Intellectual
Capital Management”
since he joined the
financial service
company Skandia as the
world’s first
corporate director for
intellectual capital
in 1991. At Skandia he
pioneered the
development of a
management and
reporting model –
entitled the Navigator
– based around
intellectual capital.
His 1997 book, “Intellectual
Capital”,
co-authored with
Michael Malone, drew
on his experiences at
Skandia. Edvinsson has
left the company in
Fall 1999 and became
the World’s
first associate
professor in
Intellectual Capital
and Knowledge
Economics at Lund
University in Sweden
and serves as board
member for various
companies and is much
in demand as speaker.
This gave him the
opportunity to have a
much broader view on
Intellectual Capital
management, which is
precisely what he is
sharing with his
readers in his new
book “Corporate
Longitude”. The
journey, Leif
Edvinsson’s story,
starts in the 17th
century when King
Charles II of England
founded the Royal
Observatory within the
park at Greenwich. The
Observatory was tasked
with finding a method
of accurately
determining longitude
at sea so that sailors
could navigate the
world’s oceans.
About 60 years later a
little-educated
clockmaker from
Lincolnshire, John
Harrison, arrived in
London to work on this
task and to win the
prize which was set
out for finding a
solution “tried and
found Practicable and
Useful at Sea”.
Harrison was an
inspired thinker and
innovator and he
approached the problem
from new perspectives.
But he was an
outsider. It was
thought that the
answer to the problem
would emerge for the
scientific elite or
the professionals in
the Navy. Harrison’s
work was ignored and
overlooked and it took
him thirty years to
enhance the design of
his solution and to
convince the officials
that he possessed the
answer and deserved
the price. According
to Edvinsson, similar
challenges currently
face the business
world. Modern
corporations are used
to act only in one
dimension and
calibrate along one,
single measure:
financial capital.
This does not allow a
company to sail the
knowledge based
economy of today with
sustaining success.
The financial view
gives corporations
only part of the
picture, only half of
the co-ordinates
required to know their
precise location and
to map out the route
to their renewal.
Without another
lateral co-ordinate
– a measurement for
intellectual capital
and other vital
intangibles –
companies are unable
to locate their true
potential or chart a
meaningful course into
the future. To
most twenty-first
century men and women,
the mind is as
mysterious as
longitude was to
eighteenth century
sailors, as Edvinsson
writes. And we are
disbelieving of the
brain’s potential.
We need fresh,
longitudinal,
perspectives to make
sense of our most
cherished possessions.
But also to
organizations the
implications are
significant.
Unfortunately, most
organizations are even
less prepared for the
challenge of
“knowledge
economics” than
individuals are. But
when managerial
methods and notions of
how best to organize
ourselves stand still,
when the world moves
on into the knowledge
economy of the 21st
century, this results
in organizational
failures. Without
means of measuring
longitude, all see
navigation was
regional. Sailors
needed a clockmaker to
crack the longitude
problem so they could
chart their
whereabouts accurately
and easily. And this
is the context in
which modern
corporations and
institutions operate.
For all the talk of
the global economy,
companies and those
who work within them
remain trapped in
their own intellectual
and geographical
locale. They are
fearful of leaving the
protection of the
coastal shelf they
know. To move further
out, to venture from
safety into new realms
filled with personal
and commercial
potential, they need a
practical method for
measuring corporate
longitude –
something which is
urgently needed. This
is the mission of Leif
Edvinsson’s new book
and the objective of
the journey to which
he takes the reader.
Here the
“chapters” of the
journey: 1.
My
Journey
– Every journey
begins, but not all
reach their aspired
end (this one starts
at Villa Askudden near
Stockholm, the Skandia
Future Center) 2.
The
New Knowledge
Economics
– The economics of
goods and markets have
given way to the
economics of knowledge
and the migration of
knowledge (about
thought leaders,
knowledge recipes, and
the “intangible
hand”) 3.
Changing
the Nature of Value
– One man’s
treasure is another
man’s worthless
mystery (what is
valuable?, talent
markets, trust,
relationship capital) 4.
Renaissance
Perspectives
– Enterprise &
people are built in
the future not in the
past (accounting and
the intangible gap,
new perspectives to
navigate the future) 5.
1+1=11
–
the new theory of the
firm (the chaordic
organization – the
future of business
organizations, human
capital X structural
capital = intellectual
capital, creating
intelligent and
holistic enterprising) 6.
Workplace
fit for knowledge
workers –
You are where you work
(knowledge work spaces
with sense and
meaning) 7.
U-Capital
& I-Commerce –
We are what we
visualize (one man’s
south is another
man’s north, brain
stress, building
identity assets) 8.
The
Knowledge Innovation
Dimension –
The only vital value
an enterprise has is
the experience,
skills, innovativeness
and insights of its
people (innovation
perspectives, white
space management /
managing the space
between organizational
boxes, innovating
culture) 9.
Leading
with a compass –
The leader always
required a compass.
Now the leader must
posses a mental
compass (leading the
new generation / the
new challenges,
refining the behaviour
and attitude of
leaders, the
leader’s job today /
shaping leadership
perspectives) 10.
The
Intellectual Wealth of
Nations –
The stories of our
societies and of our
nations are mirrors of
our selves and our
organizations (the new
wealth of nations,
taking stock of the
world). Leif
Edvinsson writes on
his arrival:
“My learning from
this journey are many.
What I know is that
the wave is
increasing. It has
gathered within
universities,
accounting standards
groups, political and
business communities.
The message is that we
need to surf the wave
of knowledge economics
or drown. The
opportunity is great.
There are a great many
people who are lost at
sea, lost
in the fog of
the labour market, the
stock market or
confused by the
political world. They
need to understand
corporate longitude
otherwise they will
continue to go around
in befuddled circles.
Knowledge navigation
will continue on the
quest for the new
wealth of nations.
There is no end, just
another question,
another curious leap
into the dark. In the
knowledge economy, the
beginning is an end in
itself”. “Corporate
Longitude” is not
just a book about
Intellectual Capital
or Knowledge
Management. It’s a
culmination point of
all the related ideas,
thoughts and concepts.
Leif Edvinsson did a
tremendous job in
documenting not only
the though path of his
own work of the last
decade, he also made
the underlying network
of people and ideas
transparent through
the “compass
links” at the end of
each chapter and on
the official
website of his new
book.
This book is a
must read for everyone
interested in
management science and
economics or just in
his or her personal
career. About the author: Leif
Edvinsson, who
calls himself a
global knowledge
nomad, championed
early moves to nourish
intellectual capital
(IC) and to have it
measured in corporate
annual reports. His
1997 book “Intellectual
Capital”
(co-authored with
Michael Malone) drew
on Edvinsson’s
experiences at the
financial service
company Skandia where
he was appointed the
world’s first
corporate director of
intellectual capital
in 1991. He is also
co-author of
“Accounting for
Minds” (with
Gottfried Grafström,
1998). At Skandia,
Edvinsson pioneered
the development of a
management and
reporting model –
entitled the Navigator
– based around
intellectual capital.
He also developed the
“Skandia Future
Center”, an
organizational
laboratory, as a
knowledge innovation
tool. Having left
Skandia in Fall 1999,
he was recently
appointed the
World’s first
associate professor in
Intellectual Capital
and Knowledge
Economics at Lund
University in Sweden,
and he is much in
demand as a board
member and speaker. He
is now developing a
holding company for
intellectual capital
recipes Universal
Networking
Intellectual Capital (UNIC
– www.unic.net) Interview
with Leif Edvinsson:
Intellectual Capital:
the new wealth of
corporations by
Juergen Daum Corporate
Longitude: Discover
Your True Position in
the Knowledge Economy |
|
In order to achieve
the all-important differentiation, companies have to think about how to use
the electronic marketplace in a novel way to deliver unique and superior
value
The
first E-Business wave with utopian visions of electronic marketplaces that
dominate entire industries, organizing trading, the matching of buyers and
sellers, in new ways and dictating their business models to all industry
players has passed by. In the meanwhile a great number of e-marketplaces has
imploded, unable to attract the necessary business volume. They ignored the
basic lesson that the very architecture of the Internet had taught:
Interlinked dynamic networks, as opposed to large centralized structures, are
the superior organizational forms. Today’s complex business relationships
cannot thrive in a rigid corset of simplistic processes, as provided by many
e-markets, any more than they could under central planning regimes. Instead,
they need a flexible service network to support diversity and innovation.
“E-topia is now gone. It is an irony of fate that the Internet hype has faded
at the very moment the importance of electronic business was becoming
evident” says Holmes in the fictitious dialog with Watson in the prologue to
the book. The mission of “Digital Storm” is to describe how electronic
business will really change the world and what companies have to do to
leverage its power. The
authors give an excellent account of the rise of the e-marketplaces and the
digital storm they encountered by their pioneering acts. They do not just
show what went wrong; they also show that the potential of the e-market
places will continue to be in a networked environment, albeit a different
one. With “Digital Storm” the authors want to dig much deeper than many
others did during the first e-business / e-market wave and their aim is to
show, that the burst of the Internet bubble does not mean that e-business has
lost its power. On the contrary. After the corrections made in their
e-business strategies based on the past experiences, companies and the
economy at large will rely heavily on electronic business and on new forms of
electronic marketplaces. The core of their message is, that differentiation,
not imitation (which happened widely during the first e-business wave),
creates value. Profitability will come from innovative value propositions.
Thus future e-markets will differ in many ways from today’s landscape.
Companies will use the support of multiple e-markets to enable their trading
networks. They will, however, refrain from a “portfolio approach” to markets.
Instead they will avoid overlap, but use complementary e-markets. These
markets, like other companies, have to differentiate. The authors believe, that
this means for individual companies and their e-business / e-market
initiatives that §
Successful players will strive to consolidate
the segment §
Markets become networked §
Every company will have a private marketplace §
E-markets will increasingly focus on services §
Dynamic trading partner networks will
evolve Anybody
who has ever led an e-business initiative can confirm that it all starts and
ends with the software. Therefore software is playing a key role in the
e-business and e-market vision of the authors. Software determines the
ability of companies to leverage the Internet. Sadly, software is also the
weakest element of the infrastructure. The authors talk about the “software
gap”. The complexity of software, slow progress in development and
compatibility requirements with legacy systems are the main reasons for this
software gap. Reinventing software as a service could lead the way out of
this “software gap”. An architectural solution, Web services, has been
proposed and is being pursued by many vendors. It consists of self-describing
“Lego”-Software, interacting through the Internet. Pioneered by
Hewlett-Packard, Web services have recently been most prominently adopted by
Microsoft in its .Net initiative. If successful, they could bridge the
software gap. The
most essential task for companies in pursuing an e-business / e-market based
business strategy is to develop a strategic perspective first. Incremental
improvements of existing business models and processes are inappropriate in
the electronic marketplace at this point in time. Too many things are in
flux. Ambitious initiatives are under way, claiming – rightly or wrongly – to
restructure whole industries. It is thus essential for companies, the authors
write, to step back and reconsider the own industry from the bottom up. When
they have understood the potential for truly innovative value creation, they
will be able to judge the current initiatives in the electronic marketplace
and devise their own e-business strategy. Therefore Gerbert, Birch, Schnetkamp
and Schneider recommend a multi-step approach in developing the e-business
strategy of the company: §
Understand today’s value delivery
network and trends (of the own industry): §
Identify core processes and pain
points: §
Map out current e-market
initiatives: §
Devise (extreme) end game
scenarios and triggers: §
Design end-customer driven value
innovations: In
the end, what matters for a company is its ability to identify and execute
its own winning e-play. Its business may be at stake. Also the financial
commitments for a strong e-business/e-market initiative are substantial. Thus
the strategy should be well elaborated. At the same time, project efficiency
is critical in the fast moving electronic marketplace. Therefore the authors
describe in the last chapter a tested streamlined process companies can
follow to build a promising e-business. “Digital
Storm” is not about the Internet. It is about doing business in the new
century. In 1999 Lou Gerstner, Chief Executive of IBM, commented: "The
dot.coms are only the fireflies before the storm." While much has been
written about the fireflies, the current book focuses on the storm. More
specifically, it provides insights to help companies sail through the digital
storm, while exposing shortcomings in past and present concepts. The authors
use strong examples in explaining why online e-marketplaces have evolved the
way they have, and they do a great job of laying the groundwork to help
leaders navigate through the future innovations we're likely to see. Digital
Storm provides a comprehensive picture of the electronic business-to-business
landscape and its likely evolution. The book delivers a sharp analysis that
cuts through the rather short-lived business coverage available so far. This
is a definite must-read for everyone who needs to understand the pitfalls in
building e-marketplaces and how to exploit their potential. About the authors: Philipp
Gerbert is a partner of the McKenna Group and is based at
its headquarters in Silicon Valley. He has extensive experience in electronic
business / electronic commerce, Internet infrastructure and innovation
management. He serves large multinationals as well as emerging new players.
He is on the board of several Silicon Valley ventures and is a regular
contributor to major business publications. The McKenna Group (www.mckenna-group.com) from Silicon
Valley is the leading strategic consulting firm for technology-enabled
growth. Alex
Birch is a director in the London office of OC&C
Strategy Consultants (www.occstrategy.co.uk).
His particular interest lies in how to exploit new technologies to achieve
growth. He advices companies – both large and small – in the
telecommunications, media, entertainment and leisure industries. He is on the
board of a number of early-stage businesses. Gert
Schnetkamp heads the German office of OC&C Strategy
Consultants (www.occstrategy.de).
He is an internationally acclaimed authority in the retail and services
sectors and has been heavily involved in the development of strategies for
leading companies entering the New Economy in a broad range of sectors.
Together with Dirk Schneider, he wrote a German language precursor of
the current book called “E-Markets”. The Digital
Storm - Fresh Business Strategies from the Electronic Marketplace Hardcover - 352
pages (July 2001) |
|
Not high-profile leaders with big personalities, but CEOs with a paradoxical blend of personal humility and professional will are required to lead companies from good to great
A
Decade ago Jim Collins made a name for himself with the book “Built to
Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies”. That best-seller,
written with Jerry Porras, looked deeply at companies that were outstanding
at their founding and managed to sustain their greatness. But the companies
he wrote about in that book were, for the most part, always great. They never
had to turn themselves from good companies into great companies. They had
parents like David Packard and George Merck, who shaped the character of
greatness from early on. But what about the vast majority of companies that
wake up partway through life and realize that they are good, but not great ?
What about companies that are merely good, or even mediocre, and then achieve
greatness ? That is the subject of Collins’ “Good to Great: Why Some
Companies Make the Leap…and Others Don’t”, the culmination of five years of
work by Collins and a team of 20 researchers. What
this book makes unique and a must read for everybody interested in management
is that it breaks with the common opinions about what the best leaders are or
have to be. Collins and his team are proving that the best leaders are not
the famous charismatic “super CEO” type of managers. Instead, they are making
the case, that level 5 leaders, that is how they are calling them, are the
ones who are able to lead their companies from good to great. Level 5 leaders
are ambitious for the success of the company rather than for themselves. They
also want to set up the company for success in the next generation, so it can
be come even greater. In contrast, the level 4 leader is not interested in
having the company continue on a great level after he’s gone. After all, it’s
a testament to his greatness that his company can’t sustain its greatness
without him. Collins
insists, that he was not looking specifically for Level 5 leader in his
study. In fact he told his researchers to downplay the role of the top
executive in order to avoid the “leadership is everything” line of thinking
so common today. They identified out of 1,435 companies that appeared on the
Fortune 500 companies that followed a pattern: 15 years of cumulative stock
returns at or below the general stock market, then a transition point leading
to cumulative returns of at least three times the market over the next 15
years. These are, according to Collins criteria, the companies that went from
good or average to great. The researchers found 11 companies that met this
criteria. They were hardly glamorous corporations: Kimberley-Clark, Abbott,
Fannie Mae, Gillette, Pitney Bowes, Circuit city, Kroger, Nucor, Philip
Morris, Walgreens and Wells Fargo. The team then compared these good-to-great
companies with a group of “direct comparison companies” – those that were in
the same industry as the good-to-great companies with the same opportunities
and similar resources at the time of transition, but couldn’t make the leap,
and another group of companies – named “unsustained comparisons”, which made
a short term shift from good to great but failed to maintain the trajectory. Then
they tried to identify what was inside the Black Box which represented the
specific capability of the good-to-great companies compared with the others.
They compared the 28 companies under investigation and were looking for
everything from acquisitions to executive compensation, from business
strategy to corporate culture, from layoffs to leadership style, from
financial ratios to management turnover. Collins and his team were just as
astonished at what they did not find as what they did. Here some examples: -
Lager-than-life, celebrity leaders who ride in
from the outside are negatively correlated with taking a company from
good to great. Ten of eleven
good-to-great CEOs came from inside the company, whereas the
comparison companies tried outside CEOs six times more often. -
They found not systematic pattern linking
specific forms of executive compensation to the process of going from good to
great. The idea that the structure of executive compensation is a key driver
in corporate performance is simply not supported by the data. -
The good-to-great companies did not focus
principally on what to do to become great; they focused equally on
what not to do what to stop doing -
Technology and technology-driven change has
virtually nothing to do with igniting a transformation from good to great.
Technology can accelerate a transformation, but technology cannot cause
a transformation -
The good-to-great companies paid scant
attention to managing change, motivating people, or creating alignment. Under
the right conditions, the problems of commitment, alignment, motivation, and
change largely melt away. -
The good-to-great companies had not name, tag
line, launch event, or program to signify their transformations. Indeed, some
reported being unaware of the magnitude of the transformation at the time;
only later, in retrospect, did it become clear. They produced a truly
revolutionary leap in results, but not by a revolutionary process. -
The good-to-great companies were not, by and
large, in great industries, and some were in terrible industries. So Collins
concludes: greatness is not a function of circumstance. Greatness is largely
a matter of conscious choice. Colin’s
and his researcher’s findings, in particular about leadership, may well
influence the way companies go about choosing CEOs. Instead of seeking the
brightest star in the firmament, boards may more readily look inside their
own companies. According
to Collin’s, the boards in the good-to-great companies understood that they
were trying to built share value; the boards in the comparison companies were
trying to increase share price. The difference in Collin’s words is, that a
CEO can affect share price in a two-year period in any number of ways without
increasing underlying share value. Thinking about the price of a share in
anything less than a five-year horizon, means to confuse the concepts of
price and value. And that requires from the board to stay back and select a
CEO that is focused on the fundamentals of the company not on hype and their
own celebrity. Collins
cites several examples in his books that emphasize the difference between
level 5 and level 4 leaders. As an example for a level 4 leader he names
Stanley Gault at Rubbermaid. A man who knew what to do, when he joined, and
who got good results, even great results, but when he walks away, the place
implodes – he just left helpers, no one that could replace him. He lacked to
transfer his capabilities into the organization – which is what level 5
leaders do, who prepare their companies for the days after them. Level 5
leaders are very comfortable being surrounded by outstanding people. They
also try to create the excellence within the organization, within its
structural capital instead to tie it to a person, to themselve, like level 4
leaders do. Here
the key findings of the study: Collins
concludes that average companies can indeed morph into great ones. Provided
that the select disciplined people and apply disciplined thought and
disciplined action. Among the conclusions about Good to Great companies: 1. Their
leaders are less differentiated by charisma or brilliant vision and more by
humility, unrelenting will and by focus on the fundamentals of the company 8. There
are no inconsistencies with reconciling short-term financial performance
pressures and maintaining long-term adherence to working the flywheel of the
hedgehog concept to create a virtuous cycle of growth and sustenance. In
short, these companies embrace the paradox that managing for both short-term
and long-term success simultaneously is challenging but part of the
"problem" being solved by the business. As
I wrote earlier, we are today somehow at an inclination point in enterprise
management which requires companies to conceive, implement and use new
techniques in general management that will keep them in business in the
future and enable them to manage for sustainable profitability and
growth in an environment, that is totally different from the one, where most
of our management techniques of today originated: from the industrial
manufacturing enterprise. But succeed in the transformation is not only about
management techniques and management systems. It’s at least equally important
which people are running the companies, it’s also important to select the
right top managers and CEO’s. Collin’s new book provides very valuable and
surprising insights for the criteria boards have to imply in this selection
process. “GOOD
TO GREAT” is one of those rare books that presents important research
findings, and then explains in a clear, concise and compelling manner how to
take that learning and directly apply it to effect a good-to-great
transformation in any company. About the author: Jim
Collins is coauthor of “Built
to Last”, a bestseller for over five years with a million copies
in print. A student of enduring great companies, he serves as a teacher to
leaders throughout the corporate and social sectors. Formerly a faculty
member at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business, where he
received the Distinguished Teaching Award, he now works from his management
research laboratory in Boulder, Colaroda, USA. He can be reached at www.jimcollins.com Good to
Great: Why some companies make the leap…and others don’t Hardcover - 320
pages (October 2001) |