
Juergen Daum’s Book Store on New Economy Management Best Practice Literature:
Archive of past "Books of The Month":
|
The Book of The Month
June/July 2002: |
|
The Book of The Month March 2002: |
|
The Book of The Month January/February 2002:
|
|
The Book of The Month November/December 2001:
|
| The Book of The Month, October 2001: Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting by Baruch Lev |
| The Book of The Month, September 2001: Managing The Professional Service Firm by David H. Maister |
| The Book of The Month, Mai/June 2001: The Value Reporting Revolution: Moving Beyond the Earnings Game by Robert G. Eccles, Robert H. Herz, E. Mary Keegan, David M. H. Phillips |
| The Book of The Month, April 2001: The Mind of the C.E.O. by Jeffrey E. Garten |
| The Book of The Month, March 2001: The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail by Clayton M. Christensen |
| The Book of The Month, February 2001: The Long Boom: A vision for the coming age of prosperity by Peter Schwartz, Peter Leyden and Joel Hyatt |
| The Book of The Month, January 2001: The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization by Thomas L. Friedman |
| The Book of The Month, December 2000: The Strategy-Focused Organization by Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton |
| The Book of The Month, November 2000: Meta-Capitalism by Grady Means and David Schneider |
| The Book of The Month, October 2000: Future Wealth by Stan Davis and Christopher Meyer |
| The Book of The Month, September 2000: Living and Working in an Interconnected World by Daniel Amor |
| The Book of The Month, August 2000: Funky Business: Talent Makes Capital Dance by Jonas Ridderstrale, Kjell Nordstrom |
Back to actual book of the month
The Book of The Month June/July 2002:
|
Companies
need new navigation
tools
Leif
Edvinsson is using an
analogy of the naval
world to bring over
his message in his new
book: longitude,
which stands for
long-term, long
lasting – precisely
what is missing in
today’s turbo
management approach
focused on short term
earnings. Instead, his
compass leads us to an
orientation of new
coordinates for
sustainable results by
using both the full
potential of human
individuals and of
organizations that
provide context,
structure and
relationships to
talented people to
create sustainable
value for customers,
shareholders, other
stakeholders, and
societies. “Corporate
Longitude” describes
a journey, basically
the journey of the
author through ten
years of work on
“Intellectual
Capital Management”
since he joined the
financial service
company Skandia as the
world’s first
corporate director for
intellectual capital
in 1991. At Skandia he
pioneered the
development of a
management and
reporting model –
entitled the Navigator
– based around
intellectual capital.
His 1997 book, “Intellectual
Capital”,
co-authored with
Michael Malone, drew
on his experiences at
Skandia. Edvinsson has
left the company in
Fall 1999 and became
the World’s
first associate
professor in
Intellectual Capital
and Knowledge
Economics at Lund
University in Sweden
and serves as board
member for various
companies and is much
in demand as speaker.
This gave him the
opportunity to have a
much broader view on
Intellectual Capital
management, which is
precisely what he is
sharing with his
readers in his new
book “Corporate
Longitude”. The
journey, Leif
Edvinsson’s story,
starts in the 17th
century when King
Charles II of England
founded the Royal
Observatory within the
park at Greenwich. The
Observatory was tasked
with finding a method
of accurately
determining longitude
at sea so that sailors
could navigate the
world’s oceans.
About 60 years later a
little-educated
clockmaker from
Lincolnshire, John
Harrison, arrived in
London to work on this
task and to win the
prize which was set
out for finding a
solution “tried and
found Practicable and
Useful at Sea”.
Harrison was an
inspired thinker and
innovator and he
approached the problem
from new perspectives.
But he was an
outsider. It was
thought that the
answer to the problem
would emerge for the
scientific elite or
the professionals in
the Navy. Harrison’s
work was ignored and
overlooked and it took
him thirty years to
enhance the design of
his solution and to
convince the officials
that he possessed the
answer and deserved
the price. According
to Edvinsson, similar
challenges currently
face the business
world. Modern
corporations are used
to act only in one
dimension and
calibrate along one,
single measure:
financial capital.
This does not allow a
company to sail the
knowledge based
economy of today with
sustaining success.
The financial view
gives corporations
only part of the
picture, only half of
the co-ordinates
required to know their
precise location and
to map out the route
to their renewal.
Without another
lateral co-ordinate
– a measurement for
intellectual capital
and other vital
intangibles –
companies are unable
to locate their true
potential or chart a
meaningful course into
the future. To
most twenty-first
century men and women,
the mind is as
mysterious as
longitude was to
eighteenth century
sailors, as Edvinsson
writes. And we are
disbelieving of the
brain’s potential.
We need fresh,
longitudinal,
perspectives to make
sense of our most
cherished possessions.
But also to
organizations the
implications are
significant.
Unfortunately, most
organizations are even
less prepared for the
challenge of
“knowledge
economics” than
individuals are. But
when managerial
methods and notions of
how best to organize
ourselves stand still,
when the world moves
on into the knowledge
economy of the 21st
century, this results
in organizational
failures. Without
means of measuring
longitude, all see
navigation was
regional. Sailors
needed a clockmaker to
crack the longitude
problem so they could
chart their
whereabouts accurately
and easily. And this
is the context in
which modern
corporations and
institutions operate.
For all the talk of
the global economy,
companies and those
who work within them
remain trapped in
their own intellectual
and geographical
locale. They are
fearful of leaving the
protection of the
coastal shelf they
know. To move further
out, to venture from
safety into new realms
filled with personal
and commercial
potential, they need a
practical method for
measuring corporate
longitude –
something which is
urgently needed. This
is the mission of Leif
Edvinsson’s new book
and the objective of
the journey to which
he takes the reader.
Here the
“chapters” of the
journey: 1.
My
Journey
– Every journey
begins, but not all
reach their aspired
end (this one starts
at Villa Askudden near
Stockholm, the Skandia
Future Center) 2.
The
New Knowledge
Economics
– The economics of
goods and markets have
given way to the
economics of knowledge
and the migration of
knowledge (about
thought leaders,
knowledge recipes, and
the “intangible
hand”) 3.
Changing
the Nature of Value
– One man’s
treasure is another
man’s worthless
mystery (what is
valuable?, talent
markets, trust,
relationship capital) 4.
Renaissance
Perspectives
– Enterprise &
people are built in
the future not in the
past (accounting and
the intangible gap,
new perspectives to
navigate the future) 5.
1+1=11
–
the new theory of the
firm (the chaordic
organization – the
future of business
organizations, human
capital X structural
capital = intellectual
capital, creating
intelligent and
holistic enterprising) 6.
Workplace
fit for knowledge
workers –
You are where you work
(knowledge work spaces
with sense and
meaning) 7.
U-Capital
& I-Commerce –
We are what we
visualize (one man’s
south is another
man’s north, brain
stress, building
identity assets) 8.
The
Knowledge Innovation
Dimension –
The only vital value
an enterprise has is
the experience,
skills, innovativeness
and insights of its
people (innovation
perspectives, white
space management /
managing the space
between organizational
boxes, innovating
culture) 9.
Leading
with a compass –
The leader always
required a compass.
Now the leader must
posses a mental
compass (leading the
new generation / the
new challenges,
refining the behaviour
and attitude of
leaders, the
leader’s job today /
shaping leadership
perspectives) 10.
The
Intellectual Wealth of
Nations –
The stories of our
societies and of our
nations are mirrors of
our selves and our
organizations (the new
wealth of nations,
taking stock of the
world). Leif
Edvinsson writes on
his arrival:
“My learning from
this journey are many.
What I know is that
the wave is
increasing. It has
gathered within
universities,
accounting standards
groups, political and
business communities.
The message is that we
need to surf the wave
of knowledge economics
or drown. The
opportunity is great.
There are a great many
people who are lost at
sea, lost
in the fog of
the labour market, the
stock market or
confused by the
political world. They
need to understand
corporate longitude
otherwise they will
continue to go around
in befuddled circles.
Knowledge navigation
will continue on the
quest for the new
wealth of nations.
There is no end, just
another question,
another curious leap
into the dark. In the
knowledge economy, the
beginning is an end in
itself”. “Corporate
Longitude” is not
just a book about
Intellectual Capital
or Knowledge
Management. It’s a
culmination point of
all the related ideas,
thoughts and concepts.
Leif Edvinsson did a
tremendous job in
documenting not only
the though path of his
own work of the last
decade, he also made
the underlying network
of people and ideas
transparent through
the “compass
links” at the end of
each chapter and on
the official
website of his new
book.
This book is a
must read for everyone
interested in
management science and
economics or just in
his or her personal
career. About the author: Leif
Edvinsson, who
calls himself a
global knowledge
nomad, championed
early moves to nourish
intellectual capital
(IC) and to have it
measured in corporate
annual reports. His
1997 book “Intellectual
Capital”
(co-authored with
Michael Malone) drew
on Edvinsson’s
experiences at the
financial service
company Skandia where
he was appointed the
world’s first
corporate director of
intellectual capital
in 1991. He is also
co-author of
“Accounting for
Minds” (with
Gottfried Grafström,
1998). At Skandia,
Edvinsson pioneered
the development of a
management and
reporting model –
entitled the Navigator
– based around
intellectual capital.
He also developed the
“Skandia Future
Center”, an
organizational
laboratory, as a
knowledge innovation
tool. Having left
Skandia in Fall 1999,
he was recently
appointed the
World’s first
associate professor in
Intellectual Capital
and Knowledge
Economics at Lund
University in Sweden,
and he is much in
demand as a board
member and speaker. He
is now developing a
holding company for
intellectual capital
recipes Universal
Networking
Intellectual Capital (UNIC
– www.unic.net) Interview
with Leif Edvinsson:
Intellectual Capital:
the new wealth of
corporations by
Juergen Daum Corporate
Longitude: Discover
Your True Position in
the Knowledge Economy |
|
In order to achieve
the all-important differentiation, companies have to think about how to use
the electronic marketplace in a novel way to deliver unique and superior
value
The
first E-Business wave with utopian visions of electronic marketplaces that
dominate entire industries, organizing trading, the matching of buyers and
sellers, in new ways and dictating their business models to all industry
players has passed by. In the meanwhile a great number of e-marketplaces has
imploded, unable to attract the necessary business volume. They ignored the
basic lesson that the very architecture of the Internet had taught:
Interlinked dynamic networks, as opposed to large centralized structures, are
the superior organizational forms. Today’s complex business relationships
cannot thrive in a rigid corset of simplistic processes, as provided by many
e-markets, any more than they could under central planning regimes. Instead,
they need a flexible service network to support diversity and innovation.
“E-topia is now gone. It is an irony of fate that the Internet hype has faded
at the very moment the importance of electronic business was becoming
evident” says Holmes in the fictitious dialog with Watson in the prologue to
the book. The mission of “Digital Storm” is to describe how electronic
business will really change the world and what companies have to do to
leverage its power. The
authors give an excellent account of the rise of the e-marketplaces and the
digital storm they encountered by their pioneering acts. They do not just
show what went wrong; they also show that the potential of the e-market
places will continue to be in a networked environment, albeit a different
one. With “Digital Storm” the authors want to dig much deeper than many
others did during the first e-business / e-market wave and their aim is to
show, that the burst of the Internet bubble does not mean that e-business has
lost its power. On the contrary. After the corrections made in their
e-business strategies based on the past experiences, companies and the
economy at large will rely heavily on electronic business and on new forms of
electronic marketplaces. The core of their message is, that differentiation,
not imitation (which happened widely during the first e-business wave),
creates value. Profitability will come from innovative value propositions.
Thus future e-markets will differ in many ways from today’s landscape.
Companies will use the support of multiple e-markets to enable their trading
networks. They will, however, refrain from a “portfolio approach” to markets.
Instead they will avoid overlap, but use complementary e-markets. These
markets, like other companies, have to differentiate. The authors believe, that
this means for individual companies and their e-business / e-market
initiatives that §
Successful players will strive to consolidate
the segment §
Markets become networked §
Every company will have a private marketplace §
E-markets will increasingly focus on services §
Dynamic trading partner networks will
evolve Anybody
who has ever led an e-business initiative can confirm that it all starts and
ends with the software. Therefore software is playing a key role in the
e-business and e-market vision of the authors. Software determines the
ability of companies to leverage the Internet. Sadly, software is also the
weakest element of the infrastructure. The authors talk about the “software
gap”. The complexity of software, slow progress in development and
compatibility requirements with legacy systems are the main reasons for this
software gap. Reinventing software as a service could lead the way out of
this “software gap”. An architectural solution, Web services, has been
proposed and is being pursued by many vendors. It consists of self-describing
“Lego”-Software, interacting through the Internet. Pioneered by
Hewlett-Packard, Web services have recently been most prominently adopted by
Microsoft in its .Net initiative. If successful, they could bridge the
software gap. The
most essential task for companies in pursuing an e-business / e-market based
business strategy is to develop a strategic perspective first. Incremental
improvements of existing business models and processes are inappropriate in
the electronic marketplace at this point in time. Too many things are in
flux. Ambitious initiatives are under way, claiming – rightly or wrongly – to
restructure whole industries. It is thus essential for companies, the authors
write, to step back and reconsider the own industry from the bottom up. When
they have understood the potential for truly innovative value creation, they
will be able to judge the current initiatives in the electronic marketplace
and devise their own e-business strategy. Therefore Gerbert, Birch, Schnetkamp
and Schneider recommend a multi-step approach in developing the e-business
strategy of the company: §
Understand today’s value delivery
network and trends (of the own industry): §
Identify core processes and pain
points: §
Map out current e-market
initiatives: §
Devise (extreme) end game
scenarios and triggers: §
Design end-customer driven value
innovations: In
the end, what matters for a company is its ability to identify and execute
its own winning e-play. Its business may be at stake. Also the financial
commitments for a strong e-business/e-market initiative are substantial. Thus
the strategy should be well elaborated. At the same time, project efficiency
is critical in the fast moving electronic marketplace. Therefore the authors
describe in the last chapter a tested streamlined process companies can
follow to build a promising e-business. “Digital
Storm” is not about the Internet. It is about doing business in the new
century. In 1999 Lou Gerstner, Chief Executive of IBM, commented: "The
dot.coms are only the fireflies before the storm." While much has been
written about the fireflies, the current book focuses on the storm. More
specifically, it provides insights to help companies sail through the digital
storm, while exposing shortcomings in past and present concepts. The authors
use strong examples in explaining why online e-marketplaces have evolved the
way they have, and they do a great job of laying the groundwork to help
leaders navigate through the future innovations we're likely to see. Digital
Storm provides a comprehensive picture of the electronic business-to-business
landscape and its likely evolution. The book delivers a sharp analysis that
cuts through the rather short-lived business coverage available so far. This
is a definite must-read for everyone who needs to understand the pitfalls in
building e-marketplaces and how to exploit their potential. About the authors: Philipp
Gerbert is a partner of the McKenna Group and is based at
its headquarters in Silicon Valley. He has extensive experience in electronic
business / electronic commerce, Internet infrastructure and innovation
management. He serves large multinationals as well as emerging new players.
He is on the board of several Silicon Valley ventures and is a regular
contributor to major business publications. The McKenna Group (www.mckenna-group.com) from Silicon
Valley is the leading strategic consulting firm for technology-enabled
growth. Alex
Birch is a director in the London office of OC&C
Strategy Consultants (www.occstrategy.co.uk).
His particular interest lies in how to exploit new technologies to achieve
growth. He advices companies – both large and small – in the
telecommunications, media, entertainment and leisure industries. He is on the
board of a number of early-stage businesses. Gert
Schnetkamp heads the German office of OC&C Strategy
Consultants (www.occstrategy.de).
He is an internationally acclaimed authority in the retail and services
sectors and has been heavily involved in the development of strategies for
leading companies entering the New Economy in a broad range of sectors.
Together with Dirk Schneider, he wrote a German language precursor of
the current book called “E-Markets”. The Digital
Storm - Fresh Business Strategies from the Electronic Marketplace Hardcover - 352
pages (July 2001) |
|
Not high-profile leaders with big personalities, but CEOs with a paradoxical blend of personal humility and professional will are required to lead companies from good to great
A
Decade ago Jim Collins made a name for himself with the book “Built to
Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies”. That best-seller,
written with Jerry Porras, looked deeply at companies that were outstanding
at their founding and managed to sustain their greatness. But the companies
he wrote about in that book were, for the most part, always great. They never
had to turn themselves from good companies into great companies. They had
parents like David Packard and George Merck, who shaped the character of
greatness from early on. But what about the vast majority of companies that
wake up partway through life and realize that they are good, but not great ?
What about companies that are merely good, or even mediocre, and then achieve
greatness ? That is the subject of Collins’ “Good to Great: Why Some
Companies Make the Leap…and Others Don’t”, the culmination of five years of
work by Collins and a team of 20 researchers. What
this book makes unique and a must read for everybody interested in management
is that it breaks with the common opinions about what the best leaders are or
have to be. Collins and his team are proving that the best leaders are not
the famous charismatic “super CEO” type of managers. Instead, they are making
the case, that level 5 leaders, that is how they are calling them, are the
ones who are able to lead their companies from good to great. Level 5 leaders
are ambitious for the success of the company rather than for themselves. They
also want to set up the company for success in the next generation, so it can
be come even greater. In contrast, the level 4 leader is not interested in
having the company continue on a great level after he’s gone. After all, it’s
a testament to his greatness that his company can’t sustain its greatness
without him. Collins
insists, that he was not looking specifically for Level 5 leader in his
study. In fact he told his researchers to downplay the role of the top
executive in order to avoid the “leadership is everything” line of thinking
so common today. They identified out of 1,435 companies that appeared on the
Fortune 500 companies that followed a pattern: 15 years of cumulative stock
returns at or below the general stock market, then a transition point leading
to cumulative returns of at least three times the market over the next 15
years. These are, according to Collins criteria, the companies that went from
good or average to great. The researchers found 11 companies that met this
criteria. They were hardly glamorous corporations: Kimberley-Clark, Abbott,
Fannie Mae, Gillette, Pitney Bowes, Circuit city, Kroger, Nucor, Philip
Morris, Walgreens and Wells Fargo. The team then compared these good-to-great
companies with a group of “direct comparison companies” – those that were in
the same industry as the good-to-great companies with the same opportunities
and similar resources at the time of transition, but couldn’t make the leap,
and another group of companies – named “unsustained comparisons”, which made
a short term shift from good to great but failed to maintain the trajectory. Then
they tried to identify what was inside the Black Box which represented the
specific capability of the good-to-great companies compared with the others.
They compared the 28 companies under investigation and were looking for
everything from acquisitions to executive compensation, from business
strategy to corporate culture, from layoffs to leadership style, from
financial ratios to management turnover. Collins and his team were just as
astonished at what they did not find as what they did. Here some examples: -
Lager-than-life, celebrity leaders who ride in
from the outside are negatively correlated with taking a company from
good to great. Ten of eleven
good-to-great CEOs came from inside the company, whereas the
comparison companies tried outside CEOs six times more often. -
They found not systematic pattern linking
specific forms of executive compensation to the process of going from good to
great. The idea that the structure of executive compensation is a key driver
in corporate performance is simply not supported by the data. -
The good-to-great companies did not focus
principally on what to do to become great; they focused equally on
what not to do what to stop doing -
Technology and technology-driven change has
virtually nothing to do with igniting a transformation from good to great.
Technology can accelerate a transformation, but technology cannot cause
a transformation -
The good-to-great companies paid scant
attention to managing change, motivating people, or creating alignment. Under
the right conditions, the problems of commitment, alignment, motivation, and
change largely melt away. -
The good-to-great companies had not name, tag
line, launch event, or program to signify their transformations. Indeed, some
reported being unaware of the magnitude of the transformation at the time;
only later, in retrospect, did it become clear. They produced a truly
revolutionary leap in results, but not by a revolutionary process. -
The good-to-great companies were not, by and
large, in great industries, and some were in terrible industries. So Collins
concludes: greatness is not a function of circumstance. Greatness is largely
a matter of conscious choice. Colin’s
and his researcher’s findings, in particular about leadership, may well
influence the way companies go about choosing CEOs. Instead of seeking the
brightest star in the firmament, boards may more readily look inside their
own companies. According
to Collin’s, the boards in the good-to-great companies understood that they
were trying to built share value; the boards in the comparison companies were
trying to increase share price. The difference in Collin’s words is, that a
CEO can affect share price in a two-year period in any number of ways without
increasing underlying share value. Thinking about the price of a share in
anything less than a five-year horizon, means to confuse the concepts of
price and value. And that requires from the board to stay back and select a
CEO that is focused on the fundamentals of the company not on hype and their
own celebrity. Collins
cites several examples in his books that emphasize the difference between
level 5 and level 4 leaders. As an example for a level 4 leader he names
Stanley Gault at Rubbermaid. A man who knew what to do, when he joined, and
who got good results, even great results, but when he walks away, the place
implodes – he just left helpers, no one that could replace him. He lacked to
transfer his capabilities into the organization – which is what level 5
leaders do, who prepare their companies for the days after them. Level 5
leaders are very comfortable being surrounded by outstanding people. They
also try to create the excellence within the organization, within its
structural capital instead to tie it to a person, to themselve, like level 4
leaders do. Here
the key findings of the study: Collins
concludes that average companies can indeed morph into great ones. Provided
that the select disciplined people and apply disciplined thought and
disciplined action. Among the conclusions about Good to Great companies: 1. Their
leaders are less differentiated by charisma or brilliant vision and more by
humility, unrelenting will and by focus on the fundamentals of the company 8. There
are no inconsistencies with reconciling short-term financial performance
pressures and maintaining long-term adherence to working the flywheel of the
hedgehog concept to create a virtuous cycle of growth and sustenance. In
short, these companies embrace the paradox that managing for both short-term
and long-term success simultaneously is challenging but part of the
"problem" being solved by the business. As
I wrote earlier, we are today somehow at an inclination point in enterprise
management which requires companies to conceive, implement and use new
techniques in general management that will keep them in business in the
future and enable them to manage for sustainable profitability and
growth in an environment, that is totally different from the one, where most
of our management techniques of today originated: from the industrial
manufacturing enterprise. But succeed in the transformation is not only about
management techniques and management systems. It’s at least equally important
which people are running the companies, it’s also important to select the
right top managers and CEO’s. Collin’s new book provides very valuable and
surprising insights for the criteria boards have to imply in this selection
process. “GOOD
TO GREAT” is one of those rare books that presents important research
findings, and then explains in a clear, concise and compelling manner how to
take that learning and directly apply it to effect a good-to-great
transformation in any company. About the author: Jim
Collins is coauthor of “Built
to Last”, a bestseller for over five years with a million copies
in print. A student of enduring great companies, he serves as a teacher to
leaders throughout the corporate and social sectors. Formerly a faculty
member at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business, where he
received the Distinguished Teaching Award, he now works from his management
research laboratory in Boulder, Colaroda, USA. He can be reached at www.jimcollins.com Good to
Great: Why some companies make the leap…and others don’t Hardcover - 320
pages (October 2001) |
|
The first
scientifically book on the Management and Reporting Challenge of the
future: on Intangible Assets
using the Value Chain Scoreboard,
both managers and investors can attain a comprehensive portrayal of a firm’s
innovation capabilities and success in creating economic Value."
Wealth
and growth in today's economy are primarily driven by intangible
(intellectual) assets. With the arrival of the new information technologies,
the structure of enterprises have changed dramatically within the last
decade, and intangibles represent today often the major assets of these
corporations. Physical and financial assets are rapidly becoming commodities,
yielding at best an average return on investment. Therefore, it is hardly
surprising that in recent years intangibles have captured interest by the
academia, managers and the investors. Corporate success today is not based
any more on production facilities, financial capital and ownership, but on
invisible and untouchable” values - intangible assets -, such as
relationships with business partners, brands, ideas, business processes,
corporate culture, know-how and innovation force. But unfortunately
traditional accounting is not able to capture, measure and report on
intangible assets – forcing investors, but often also managers, to act in the
dark. This book is the first comprehensive, scientifically based study of the
nature and impact of intangibles with the focus is on improving external
information communication. "Intangibles:
Management, Measurement, and Reporting” is a study of the nature and impact
of intangible assets. The book evaluates the importance of intangibles to
corporate performance, economic growth, and overall social welfare. Based on
robust empirical studies, Baruch Lev establishes an economic framework for
analysing managerial and investment issues concerning intangibles. His study
surveys the effects of intangibles on corporate performance and market value,
including managerial challenges in handling risk, protecting property rights,
encouraging marketability, and monitoring the cost structure of intangibles.
The book also addresses information deficiencies associated with intangibles
and offers recommendations for improved financial disclosure and
comparability. Most important, Lev sets forth a new and comprehensive
information system, called the Value Chain Scoreboard- aimed at satisfying
the needs of both managers and investors- to reflect the impact and value of
intangibles within the context of enterprise performance. Lev
got interested in intangible assets a decade ago, when he was teaching at
Berkley University and consulting about valuation issues that arose in the
course of litigation. The New York University offered him to set up an
accounting research institute, from which he sends out a fast-moving stream
of research work – which was condensed now in this book. In
"Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting” he is criticizing
the actual accounting and disclosure practice related to intangibles. One of
the major problems from his point of view with today’s accounting systems is,
that they are still based on transactions, such as sales. But in the current,
knowledge-based economy much of the value creation or destruction precedes,
sometimes by years, the occurrence of transactions. The successful development
of a drug, for example, creates considerable value, but actual transactions,
such as sales, may take years to materialize. Until then, the accounting
system does not register any value created in contrast to the investments
made into R&D, which are fully expensed. This difference, between how the
accounting system is handling, or better not handling, value created and is
handling investments into value creation, is the major reason for the growing
disconnect between market values and financial information. Baruch
Lev argues that this lack of public information contributes to a higher cost
of capital and affords abnormally large gains to insiders at the expense of
outside investors. To level the playing field, Lev proposes companies
periodically release, in addition to the required income, balance sheet and
cash flow statements, quantitative and standardized information most relevant
to the company value chain or business model. He
specifically recommends that companies should report about their innovation
process, because this is where economic value is created in today’s knowledge
based businesses from nearly all industries. By innovation process, he means
the fundamental economic process of innovation that starts with the discovery
of ideas for new products or services or processes, proceeds through the
development phase of these discoveries and the implementation stage and
establishment of technological feasibility, and culminates in the
commercialisation of the new products or services. And he also describes how
a related reporting system should be conceived: the so called Value Chain
Blueprint. Lev’s Value Chain Blueprint is a measure based information system
for use in both internal decision making and disclosure to investors, that
reports about every step of the innovation process. He
believes that the Value Chain Blueprint is a good starting point, but that is
it not the end. In addition he is convinced, that improved recognition of
intangible assets in the accounting system itself is required. He explains,
that the broad denial of intangibles as assets detracts from the quality of
information provided in the balances sheet. Even more serious is its adverse
effect on the measurement of earnings. The matching of revenues with expenses
is distorted by front-loading costs by the immediate expensing of intangibles
and recording revenues in subsequent periods unencumbered by those costs.
What is therefore required is a significant broadening of the recognition of
assets in financial accounting and reporting. And the author also outlines
some ideas and concepts for that. This
landmark book represents the most comprehensive and thorough scientifically
based economic analysis of intangibles to date. Building on the author's
high-impact research and first-hand experience working with executives,
consultants, and regulators, the book offers a coherent framework for
understanding the fundamental economics of intangible assets. Baruch Lev
identifies attributes of intangibles that are different from tangible assets
(property, plant, and equipment), by focusing on their distinctive role in
value-creation. He highlights the most critical issue concerning intangibles:
the need to make relevant information available to outsiders. Although the
focus is on improving external information communication, its mission of
reflecting the valuation-creation process of intangibles makes the system
potentially useful for managers who want to monitor the performance of
investment in intangibles. This book is recommended not only to someone who has an MBA, but to anyone who is interested in the broader economic issues of today. About the author: Baruch
Lev is professor of accounting and finance at New York University and the
director of the Vincent C. Ross Project for Research on Intangibles. He is
the award-winning author of several books and numerous research studies
published in the leading accounting, finance, and economic journals. He can
be reached at www.baruch-lev.com. See also the interview with Baruch Lev and Juergen Daum. Intangibles:
Management, Measurement, and Reporting
The method Lev is proposing to value “knowledge assets” -
intangible assets - of companies (called by him “Knowledge-Capital
Earnings”), was described in my new New Economy Analyst report from July 26, 2001.
|
|
Managing The
Professional Service Firm: A model how to manage businesses that rely on
individual experts in providing highly customized services
best model for tomorrow's organization in any industry. When it comes to understanding these firms, David Maister has no peers."
In our
knowledge based and increasingly service oriented economy of today, some
characteristics that have been so far unique to professional service firms,
will become more common to other industries. This includes for example the
need to balance the constraints between human capital management (the most
important resource of the firm), customer and business development, and
profitability management, in order to be able to pursue a specific growth and
market positioning strategy. So also for companies, that are not engaged in
traditional professional services, but share some of their attributes, such
as the increasing dependency on expert individuals and knowledge workers, it
is of value to learn from this industry. In the book from David H. Maister
the principles that rule professional service businesses are described in
detail. While
“Managing the Professional Service Firm” is on the market for now 8 years
(reprint in 1997), it is still one of the best books, if not the best, about
the art to manage a service business. Written by a former Harvard Professor
who served as a consultant to professional service firms worldwide for many
years, the book is of value not just for someone who is interested in
managing and organizing a professional service firm, but for anyone, who
wants to know more about how to manage a business based on the expertise of
its people. Two aspects of
professional work create the special management challenges of the
professional service firm. First, professional services involve a high degree
of customisation in their work. Management principles and approaches from the
industrial or mass-consumer sectors, as they are based on the
standardization, supervision, and marketing of repetitive tasks and products,
are not only inapplicable in the professional sector but may be dangerously
wrong. Second, professional services are highly personalized, involving the
skills of individuals. What a professional service firm sells is frequently
less the service of the firm per se then the service of specific individuals.
Both of these
characteristics demand that the firm attract and retain highly skilled
individuals. A primary consequence of this is that the professional service
firm must compete actively in two markets simultaneously: The ”output” market
for its services, and the “input” market for this productive resources, the
professional work force. It is the need to balance the often conflicting
demands and constraints imposed by these two markets that creates the special
challenge of managing the professional service firm. This book has
grown from David H. Maister’s consulting experience over ten years in working
with professional service firms, across a broad array of professions, in more
than twenty countries. In particular, he has worked closely with accountants,
actuaries, architects, consultants, executive recruiters, lawyers, public
relations counsellors, advertising agencies, engineering firms, money
managers, investment banks, real estate firms, and others. David Maister
explores issues ranging from marketing and business development to
multinational strategies, human resources policies to profit improvement,
strategic planning to effective leadership. While these
issues can be complex, Maister simplifies them by recognizing that
"every professional service firm in the world, regardless of size,
specific profession, or country of operation, has the same mission statement:
outstanding service to clients, satisfying careers for its people, and
financial success for its owners”. He explains for example why professional
service firms have to balance their workforce (juniors up to partners) and
why it is so vitally important to mix people on the right combination of
projects (brains, grey hair and procedure projects) as this builds up the
firm's human capital, and provides the means and profitability to continue to
grow steadily. The book helps to resolve many problems in professional
service firms, but, which is much more important, first it helps to identify
and articulate these problems. Very well written, this book
presents the concepts that help one understand the structures of modern
professional service firms. It is full of pramatic and inspirational insights
of the common issues faced by professional services firms, from someone who
understands their nature and causes and experienced in dealing with them. It
provides an in-depth analysis of common management and strategic issues and
suggests practicable and easy-to-understand solutions to deal with them. About the author: David H.
Maister is widely acknowledged as the world's leading authority on the
management of professional service firms. For two decades he has advised firms
in a broad spectrum of professions leading authority on the management of
professional service firms. He consults throughout the world for many
prominent firms in a broad spectrum of professions. He can be reached over
his website www.davidmaister.com Managing The
Professional Service Firm |
The Book of The Month February 2001:
|
The
Long Boom: How a New
Economy can provide
the world with a long
economic boom until
2020
“The Long Boom” starts with the recognition that the world is faced with a historic opportunity. What the authors call the Long Boom – the years from 1980 to 2020 – is a period of remarkable global transformation. Since the 1980s, a new computer and telecommunications infrastructure has been built that significantly increases the productive capacity of the economy. Through the 1990s, Americans restructured their economy to take advantage of those technologies and to sustain high levels of economic growth. Corporations are reorganizing, essentially shifting from centralized hierarchies to flexible networks. And a veritable revolution has transformed the world of finance, bringing a hyper efficient use of capital. In addition, the end of the cold war stimulated increasing integration of what is becoming a truly global economy, as well as the emergence of many new democracies. These mega trends – technological change, economic innovation, global integration, and spreading democratisation – have picked up momentum since the early 1980s, particularly in the developed countries best positioned to take advantage of them. The three authors believe – based on the positive experience in the United States and in parts of Europe - that this new kind of economy can work on a large scale. With the right choices and actions, this economic boom can take off on a global level, and we could be entering another couple of decades of vast economic expansion. They assume that major technological developments are coming in the next couple of decades in several major waves: after the computer and telecommunications technologies wave of today, biotechnology – that is the manipulation at the genetic and molecular level – will be the next driving technology. Then new energy technologies like the fuel cell will emerge, and finally nanotechnology, that is, manufacturing one atom at a time - will have equally profound consequences. “The Long Boom” is a fascinating attempt to pin down the economic potential “the New Economy” holds by examining of where we've been headed for the last 20 years with a plausible forecast of where--with a bit of good fortune and tenacity--we might be going during the next 20 years. Written by Peter Schwartz, futurist and founder of the Global Business Network, a consulting firm and think tank; Peter Leyden, former managing editor of Wired magazine; and Joel Hyatt, cofounder of Hyatt Legal Services, who teaches entrepreneurship at Stanford, it is a easy-to-read and well-edited book that describes a economic opportunity before the world now. The book is highly recommended to anyone interested in economic topics and in “the New Economy” in particular. The
Long Boom: A vision
for the coming age of
prosperity |
|
The
new strategic
management system:
Kaplan’s and Norton’s system was based on extensive research on successfully managed companies. Their research revealed, that these companies had developed a systematic approach to manage customer satisfaction, internal processes, innovation and learning as well as financial performance at the same time in a balanced way. Therefore they proposed to structure KPIs into four so called “perspectives”: financial, customer/market, internal and innovation & learning. The concept of the “Balanced Scorecard” evolved in the following years into one of the most successful management concepts ever and attracted interest from nearly every senior executive worldwide. Some 50% of major US companies have either already implemented a Balanced Scorecard based management system or are just on the way to do this right now. This unusual success and survival of a management concept over several years is not only based on the ability of the authors to identify and describe a sustaining management trend, but it is also based on their talent to sense new sub-trends and respond by adapting their concept and by developing it further. Since I started to work 2 years ago together with David Norton on the conception of a software application that supports this new concepts (SAP’s Strategic Enterprise Management solution – see also SAP’s White Paper written by David and me: “SAP Strategic Enterprise Management – The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action”) it was amazing for me to see, how the two authors have developed their concept further from conference to conference that I have attended with usually several months in between, taking into account new developments and incorporating these into it. Now the two authors, who described the original approach from 1992 in more detail in their first book “The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into action”, which had been published in 1996, came up with the new version of The Balanced Scorecard concept in their recent book, extending The Balanced Scorecard from a pure performance monitoring system into a true strategic enterprise management system. They introduce a new approach that makes strategy a continuous process owned not just by top management, but by everyone. In The Strategy-Focused Organization, Robert Kaplan and David Norton share the results of ten years of learning and research into more than 200 companies that have implemented the Balanced Scorecard. Drawing from more than twenty in-depth case studies – including Mobil, CIGNA, Nova Scotia Power, and AT&T Canada – Kaplan and Norton illustrate how Balanced Scorecard adopters have taken their ground-breaking tool to the next level. These organizations have used the scorecard to create an entirely new performance management framework that puts strategy and the centre of key management processes and systems. In the book, Kaplan and Norton articulate the five key principles required for building Strategy-Focused Organizations: (1) translate the strategy to operational terms, (2) align the organization to the strategy, (3) make strategy everyone’s everyday job, (4) make strategy a continual process, and (5) mobilize change through strong, effective leadership. The authors provide a detailed account of how a range of organizations in the private, public, and non-profit sectors have deployed these principles to achieve breakthrough, sustainable performance improvements. Written by Robert S. Kaplan, the Marvin Bower Professor of Leadership Development at Harvard Business School, and by David P. Norton, Management Consultant and President of the Balanced Scorecard Collaborative, Inc. – the worldwide competence centre for the Balanced Scorecard concept – this book shows how today’s leaders can shape their own companies to meet the challenges and reap the rewards of a new competitive era. The book is highly recommended to any reader interested in new business performance and strategy management systems that enable organizations to react faster to changes in its environment with appropriate new strategies and to execute on this new strategies in a more reliable way – thus improving business performance to levels never experienced before. The
Strategy-Focused
Organization |
|
From
Income to Wealth: Intangible
assets, the portion of
a corporation’s
market value which can
not be explained
through it’s
financial reports and
do not appear in the
firm’s balance sheet
have grown in the US
from 1982 from an
average of 38% to 85%
of total market value
in 1998. So it is not
surprising, that the
topic of intangibles
is gaining growing
interest in the
business communities
worldwide. “Future
Wealth” is a
business book which -
unlike most business
books which just
describe something
that has been going on
for some time –
takes existing trends
and information and
comes up with a new
concept and approach
to management of
intangibles: The
two authors first
provide a clear
analysis of the
fundamental difference
of the risk management
approach involved in
real business
transactions
(producing and
consuming goods -
trying to avoid risk)
and of the risk
management approach
tied to financial
transactions (bearing,
trading and managing
risk). According to
Davis and Meyer,
wealth creation in the
Information Age will
be based more and more
on conscious risk
exposure by trading
risks in intangibles
financially through
“securitization”
for example of human
capital, which will
represent the wealth
creation factor of the
future. Davis
and Meyer offer a
compelling vision of a
world in the
not-so-distant future
in which we will trade
everything of value
– including human
capital, talent, and
other intangibles in
efficient markets.
Wealth accumulation is
shifting from earned
income (salaries) to
unearned (investments)
and control of wealth
is shifting from
institutions to
individuals. Companies
will begin to invest
literally in their
employees, not
indirectly through
training and
development, and to
treat business units
as units of financial
risk whose worth
equals the quality of
their intellectual
capital. Individuals
will think less about
jobs and more about
investing in their own
human capital. As
average citizens gain
more knowledge about
investments, they will
begin to accept higher
risk for the potential
higher rewards,
turning the concept of
risk from threat to
opportunity. But
future wealth will
depend not merely on a
healthy appetite for
risk, but also on
stronger social safety
nets designed to
balance new individual
freedoms with
commensurate order. Stan
Davis is an
independent author and
speaker based in
Brookline,
Massachusetts / USA,
and the Senior
Research Fellow at the
Ernst & Young
Center for Business
Innovation in
Cambridge,
Massachusetts.
Christopher Meyer is
the Director of the
Center for Business
Innovation, a Partner
in Ernst & Young,
and President of Bios
GP, a venture applying
complexity theory to
business. Future
Wealth is seen as the
companion volume to
the author’s
best-selling book “Blur”,
with which they
already started to
describe the more
intangible nature of
today’s business in
a connected economy. ‘Future
Wealth’ by Stan
Davis and Christopher
Meyer is the most
visionary but also
convincing book about
how companies and
individuals will treat
intangibles and the
underlying
opportunities and
risks in the future
– highly
recommended! Future
Wealth |
Back to actual book of the month
Copyright, Trademarks and Disclaimer